I'm just going to say directly what I've implied previously: if you think $25 is a lot of money, you may be a wonderful snowflake but you're not a wonderful customer to a business which hopes to provide strategic intelligence to other businesses. Accordingly, your opinion on the pricing is less than relevant. If anything, $100 a month is too low because it invites comparisons to thinks like the NYT instead of comparisons to things like research reports produced by the big intelligence firms. (e.g. if you want to download ten pages of executive summary on the current state of credit card usage in the Japanese consumer market is, I think that will run you about a thousand bucks.)

I used to pay $100 a month for another service which has roughly the same value proposition (not naming it to avoid shilling), and paid for it in perpetuity by five words of microcopy it caused me to add to my purchasing page. Everything after that was gravy. I don't want to imply that five words doubled my conversions -- nothing close. It is just that a move-the-needle effect anywhere in a business where all factors are multiplicative achieves $100 so fast your head will spin. For those of you whose firms could lose my business in the petty cash drawer, changes so small I'm unable to even construct tests with sufficient precision to detect them will generate more than $100 a month.