Hacker News Reader

This would likely sell even if it had no practical utility. The actual product is a neutral-party validation of someone's life choices.

Did I make a huge and expensive mistake in deciding to buy this house? Here's $50. Be honest.

No. Your house is not going to kill you, your kids, or your pets, within 99.6% certainty.

Awesome. Best $50 I ever spent.

View on HN

I would never want to build a product or service just to collect people's money with false claims. This idea would have to be highly valuable and affordable for many people in order to be successful.

That's just it. They are not false claims. You're doing actual testing for actual home health hazards.

But the sort of person who would buy your testing service is also the sort of person that does not buy houses that typically have such hazards in them. You are mostly going to be validating subjective emotional impressions with objective empirical evidence. It's a very powerful feeling to have someone else prove without a doubt that your gut feeling was correct.

For a small minority, you will actually be identifying real household dangers, so it's a win-win business.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com