We changed the headline to the subtitle last night because the main title is so baity. If that's not good enough, the best way to explain that is to suggest a better title—i.e. an accurate and neutral title that preferably uses representative language from the article. When users do this, we're happy to use their suggestions.

I don't think we can say they are "great" at lying. Complexe instant and continuous lying is far from great and that's why computers are very far from crushing human at games like sc2

What's the progress? Last time I checked, they were able to play slightly modified abc (i.e. take opponent's range into account) and have negligible winrate at micro to small stakes before rakeback.