Half Your Brain Stands Guard When Sleeping in a New Place
npr.org
npr.org
I was thinking more about "my room", I've moved because job reasons 3 times in my life, and I always start renting a room in the new place.
First day is always the same, clean up (just in case) and try to make it feel like my room, personally.
Always sleep well, but with the time, sleep better when certain "things" are fixed to my taste in the room.
I think this maybe even hard-coded in our ADN. Because to be here, our ancestors did search and modify many caves.
Aside from that, before and after they've grown up, I'm a pretty heavy sleeper :)
I think sleep has some innocence until you lose it and afterward it changes permanently. It has in my life so far.
Yeah, it's called 'getting older'.
When I got old enough to go out places with my friends and come home later at night (past 11, for example) my dad said it took a couple years before he could fall asleep without hearing the garage door open, and he's a deep sleeper who's never had any issues sleeping anywhere.
We've joked he's going to miss his own funeral because he's slept in.
My best sleep comes when I'm camping though. This is definitely not a comfortable or familiar environment, but I still sleep very well and feel refreshed in the morning.
That being said, I usually sleep terribly in friends' houses or AirBnBs.
For me, there's also the fact that you are one unit out of very many within the hotel. Even if someone is going to be bold enough to break into a hotel room in the more "public environment", the odds are fairly low you'd be the victim from a pool of hundreds of rooms. Your stay is also brief, so you don't have a routine schedule a would-be criminal has time to study. Plus there's typically not going to be much worth stealing out of a hotel room anyway (wide screen TV, computers, etc).
I've always felt fairly safe in large apartment/condo buildings. I've never lived on the ground floor, so it feels like the odds of someone entering the building (or climbing the outside), coming to my floor, and choosing my specific unit to break into are quite low. You're very unlikely to be targeted by outside strangers; and there is a much smaller pool of people who live in the building capable of targeting you.
Three years ago I moved into an apartment with a street-level door. Basically a neighbourhood of townhouse-like buildings. It's been almost two years since I was burglarized while at work. I still don't sleep well anymore, with the ever-present feeling of dread that a nighttime home invasion is coming any day now. I can't leave the apartment for longer than 30 minutes at a time without expecting to come home to another completed burglary. I can't afford to move yet, but I can't wait for the day I go back to doubling my current rent to live in a higher class, 100+ dwelling building.
I will probably never buy a house. As I get older and save for a down payment, I'm sure it will be for a condo. I don't care for condo associations with their politics and fees, and the fact you only own or semi-own a section of an entire building. But I would never feel safe in a house where I have only a single door sitting between myself and my things, and an entire city full of parasitic people.
This thread has been really illuminating for me. I didn't realize so many people were so afraid of "criminals" that they can't even get good sleep.
It could be a neighbour you've said hello to dozens of times, watching from their window. It could be a stranger who finds it worthwhile to sit in their car watching your home. You'll never know.
Either way, they've invested time in observing you, and have specifically chosen you as their target. Yes, it makes you "targeted". When you come home to your back door broken open, and find $5000 worth of shit missing, and every drawer in your home opened and sifted through? When you can't possibly even know exactly what's missing. A month after the incident, you're still finding new things that were taken from you.
It's not just about the stolen property. It's your entire personal space ripped apart. It's a form of psychological rape. Hope you get to experience that some day.
Wow.
I can understand why you might feel emotional about a robbery. I imagine it's very invasive.
Given that, I cannot imagine why you would wish it on someone else.
My point was that it's an irrational fear: you're likely not going to get robbed and it's not worth spending a bunch of time worry about it.
You realize I posted as someone who has been through that? "Likely not going to get robbed" doesn't apply, as it's already happened. And if it happens to have been one of my neighbours who committed the crime? Great, next time they see a large box delivered to my place, they know I'm ripe for another round.
I don't really want to compare being burglarized to sexual rape, as obviously the latter is much more damaging. But would you even dare telling a woman that was raped once that she's being irrational because she's terrified every time a man walks 5 steps behind her on the street?
Do I really want you to have to experience it? No. That was a reactionary remark for making light of a victim's mental state.
Yes. It is irrational, because the likelihood of rape from a random stranger is actually extremely low.
I'm not disputing the pain of your experience. It likely was very traumatic.
However, just because something was very painful doesn't mean it's rational to live your life in fear of it happening (when its probability is low). I likewise recognize that being the victim of a terrorist attack is traumatic, but it would still be irrational to avoid planes for that reason.
This is when averaged across the entire population. A 14 year old girl walking through a "bad neighbourhood" alone at night doesn't necessary carry the same risk of rape that a 6-foot tall, bulky body builder does.
I have not either, but every single person I know who's had their home invaded is a fair bit more nervous about that sort of thing than people who haven't.
A coworker of mine had his apartment burglarized by someone who got to the roof of his building and squeezed in through the tiny bathroom window of his top floor apartment approx 8 months ago. I don't think he's gotten over it yet.
My parents are the same way, they grew up in the city, and between them have 3 different stories of being burgled, and even when they moved to a very quiet, extremely low crime (as in basically zero, aside from DUIs and the occasional marijuana arrest) rural neighborhood, still lock their doors at night.
It's much easier to case a location that is directly accessible from the street. And easier to break into a door or window for that location, rather than entering a building and then breaking down a door in a hallway with frequent foot traffic.
When you go from sharing a bed or dwelling to having a whole distinct hotel room to yourself, it can be very mentally relaxing, in my experience. (At least in short intervals; obviously I prefer having someone there with me long term. Although some couples sleep in separate rooms and report very good results!) Interesting phenomenon for sure.
Exercise. When camping, I'm typically much more active during the day than my usual routine. This is especially true if I'm on a hiking trip, walking several miles each day. But even if we've setup a stationary camp, all of the little activities add up to a lot of movement.
Lack of distractions/schedule. When camping, I typically just go to bed when I get tired, which is usually soon after it gets dark, and I wake up naturally, not to an alarm clock, typically with the sun.
Cool, dark, and quiet. It's usually cool at night, very dark, and relatively quiet. That contributes to great sleep regardless of the environment.
I've also had some of my worst sleep when camping. A couple of times when it was way, way colder than expected. It's hard to sleep when you're shivering. But mostly the problem is when it's too hot. I sleep terribly when it's warm, and I think that's true for many people.
I also think it matters whether you're camping solo or in a group. When you're with a group, I think you instinctively feel safer, but I've had some bad nights camping solo. One night especially sticks out in my mind. I'd seen a black bear and a cub earlier in the day, across a stream. They were a safe distance away and probably didn't care about me at all. But all night, whenever I heard a noise, I'd spring up and question for the thousandth time if I hung my food far enough away. It's amazing how large and menacing an opossum or deer can sound walking through the underbrush. But the next night when I met up with my companions, I had the best sleep ever. :)
I do tend to get nervous of nature at night when I'm camping, but love my experiences during the day.
So yeah I completely understand what you mean :)
Evolution? Genuine question.
Maybe more oxygen rich environment?
During this time, it was not unusual for me to get very little sleep many days in a row. As a coping mechanism, I learned somewhat to "half-sleep", where I would close one eye and relax that side while continuing to do things using the other eye.
I wouldn't consider it sleeping just on one side of the brain, but there was definitely something different going on. I found that 2-4 hours of that would help my overall wakefulness.
Fortunately I had my condition addressed, but it would have been interesting to see if over time I would have developed into a full sleep-wake state of consciousness.
That is intriguing. Can you share some techniques on doing this? If I try to close one eye only, my brain would be full engage just to keep the one eye closed.
It actually takes some effort to keep my left eye closed, but for some reason its super easy to keep my right eye closed and takes pretty much no effort at all. So it might be a biological thing. I also struggled to keep my left eye open enough to put contacts in it back when I bothered using contacts.
I imagine that your brain could easily be experiencing it as a cue for self-trained rest states, so I don't want to misunderstand your experience as identical to my own, especially if you're doing it for 2-4 hours a stretch. My own interpretation of what is going on when I do it has been that it simply reduces (a) cognitive load (maybe) and (b) unnoticed eyestrain (more likely) by eliminating any attempt at depth perception.
An hotel room is a place where I am supposed to sleep while a decent number of people (the hotel staff + anyone caring to social engineer) has full access to the door key and I rely on an unfamiliar security system to warn me when things go awry (fire, blackout, water leak etc)
The only places I would feel less safe would be a night train or a taxi in the middle of nowhere.
Do you normally sleep in an especially secure room? There seems as much likelihood that a hotel staff member would "break" in to my hotel room as someone would break in to my home. It's marginally easier for staff but then they stand to lose their livelihood, are much more likely to be caught, et cetera.
Do you leave a door propped against the door handle, or a handle alarm, or anything, to mitigate your feelings of exposure?
In Japan it was a door chain, in France you leave the key in the door and it blocks external keying. Also you'll have to pass the building gates before reaching an appartment.
It's not infailable, but it's significantly more protected than any standard hotel room.
More than anything I remember unintentionally screwing hotel keys by having them with other devices, and the hotel front would reprint them pretty easily without asking anything more than the room number and the registered name.
If that's true, I seriously wonder how you ever get in a car.
As a sign of that you wouldn't leave valuable stuff on an hotel room table while you're out, as you would in your house.
Speak for yourself.
I routinely leave my most valuable possession (my laptop) in hotel rooms. I'm not paranoid.
I've been in a hotel where my room had 2 large bolts on the inside of the door in addition to the normal lock. This did nothing for my quality of sleep!
I bet that someone's very first experience sleeping in a hotel would yield a poorer quality than their 100th one.
I tell people you need a place you can trust
Both wholly from a safety perspective to quelch this brain patrol
But also to trust your environments' behaviour
For instance, does your brain trust your phone on the night stand to leave your sleep uninterrupted? Or will it always be monitoring for familiar signals
similarly, can you trust your hotel to have consistent environment, or did you request a wake up call that your brain will be looking out for?
The Economist also reported it, and explicitly made the point that a hotel chain can use this in their marketing. Where we normally think of unique as being a good thing, this promotes consistency, so it's better to always stay in the same hotel chain instead of using Airbnb or whoever is cheapest on hotels.com.
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2816...
"This work was supported by grants to T.W. and Y.S. (NIH R01MH091801, R01EY019466, and NSF BCS 1539717). This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant Program and High-End Instrumentation Grant Program (specifically, grant numbers S10RR014978, S10RR021110, and S10RR023401)."
> This work was supported by grants to T.W. and Y.S. (NIH R01MH091801, R01EY019466, and NSF BCS 1539717). This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant Program and High-End Instrumentation Grant Program (specifically, grant numbers S10RR014978, S10RR021110, and S10RR023401). This research was carried out in part at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Massachusetts General Hospital, using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies, NCRR P41RR14075. Part of this research was also conducted using computational resources and services at the Center for Computation and Visualization, Brown University. [0]
[0]: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)3...
However, when I'm sleeping in Inn, Hotels, etc. I can sleep comfortably.
I wonder what the reasoning might be for those situations
And I always slept like a baby. In flights, in hotels etc.,
Taking many short flights for work practically forced me to learn to sleep sitting up even during the day if I was not fully rested. Many of my colleagues and frequently flying friends can do it too. But some people seem unable to do it. I found that once I understood I could do it, there was no further practice needed. Like riding a bicycle that half your friends always fall off.
In the past year I have slept in approximately 200 different beds. About once a month I do wake up in the middle of the night with the feeling that something is very wrong. Sometimes I don't understand why there is no wall next to the bed, or why there is a window there. This feeling is acutely unpleasant, even alarming. But it goes away and I go back to sleep. It doesn't seem to drag my sleep quality down.
Really hope she was misquoted there and especially since it's not a quote. There's is no evidence or tests in this study to support this claim.
I sprung up from bed, said smth i couldnt remember, and just like that passed out again when a friend got in the room in my sleep. Weird.
Lol, Game of thrones quote.
http://www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2054006051/2060445893/mmc...
What matters is how likely it was that the result you got simply arose by chance. This can only be measured relative to some a priori probabilistic model. If the odds of the result having arisen by chance (the "null hypothesis") is low, then you can confidently "reject the null hypothesis" and conclude that something else must have happened. Of course, the statistics can't tell you what that "something else" was. That requires an explanatory theory.
The problem is that the probabilistic model is also kind of arbitrary. For example, suppose you flip a coin ten times and it comes up heads every time. That odds of that happening by chance are, naively, one in 2^10. But that is only true if you only do the experiment once. If you have, say, 2^8 people flipping coins, then the odds of someone seeing 10 heads in a row is one in four. Parapsychology experiments and stock-trading schemes often fall into this trap.
This is a general problem with "big data". The more data you have, the more likely you are to see things happen by pure chance that are intuitively unlikely.
And I disagree that the number of subjects doesn't matter. It matters enormously, precisely because this is a biology experiment.
It's ironic that you say this so definitively when you were the one asking for help interpreting the statistics originally.
Lisper is completely correct. Given a large enough effect size, detecting significant differences in a small population is very possible.
The statistics are sound. The assumption we should be questioning is where the subjects came from and if they are actually representative of the population that we are extrapolating this result to.
Edit:
The correct interpretation is that the model, the foundation of the null hypothesis, didn't fail yet.
Part of this model is backed by more experiments: "The reason that we focused on SWA is that it is the only sleep characteristic that reflects the depth of sleep" [1].
The model doesn't consist of a single variable. 11 people choosing the same 7 numbers out of 49 by chance is rather unlikely. The null hypothesis would include that there are only 11 people picking, that they don't cheat, and that random chance is indeed a thing. If now 11 people would indeed all choose the same, then the experiment could be repeated, e.g. to show that they are cheating or to increase the significance.
[1] http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2816...
No. If I advance the hypothesis that reciting the Kama Sutra backwards will make you grow a third arm, then a single subject who recites the Kama Sutra backwards and shortly thereafter grows a third arm would be a statistically significant result, because the odds of someone growing a third arm by chance are quite small.
you're asking for people with deeper knowledge than you for their help, and then disagreeing with them?
I get it -- you're skeptical because of sample size. But recall that "sample size" isn't necessarily the number of test subjects, but the number of measurements, as the comment about Mercury demonstrates.
Moreover, a strong signal can be detected even from a small sample size; a coin flipping the same way 11 times in a row could be mere chance, but a roulette wheel hitting the same number 11 times in a row should not happen in the entire history of the universe by mere chance. It's not just the number of measurements, but the significance of each one, that matter for statistical confidence.
Sure, you could get an even stronger signal with a larger sample size. But that doesn't mean "a study of 11 people" is necessarily insignificant or too small of a sample. It might be too small, or it might be enough to have a very high degree of certainty.
I was talking about this experiment, the one the article is about, the one which I linked in my comment. The one which is apparently attracting modestly widespread media coverage.
The analogies are meant to demonstrate that sample size is (1) not as straightforward as asking "how many subjects" and (2) less important in circumstances where the signal is strong.
In other words, we're trying to give you the tools to evaluate for yourself. The initial article is about "an experiment involving 11 people", and your skepticism seemed to be about whether it's even possible to get valid results with that sample size (answer: yes). Even in this study, yes, you can get a valid result from "only" 11 people.
It's often the case in non-exact science studies that the results are difficult to reproduce. Besides the obvious "they're not called exact", it's interesting. What is this caused by? Would, in this example, some people lack the 'feature' of sleeping with half a brain?
I suspect it's because I lock myself in a hotel room and can expect not to be disturbed. It becomes my private space.
I did a fair amount of backpacking when I was younger (mostly in Scotland) which, almost by definition, includes sleeping in lots of different places - both in tents, bothies and sometimes bivouacs. I wonder if the association of being physically tired (carrying a pack all day up/down mountains) and new places caused an association with good sleep?
One odd association that I have is the sound of rain on an umbrella makes me drowsy - I've spent a lot of time sleeping in tents listening to rain!
That is because of the different "dust/allergen" load in the different places -- to the one in your room you have adjusted already since ages.
I find that changing my orientation on the bed results in a significant improvement. I suspect that it might have something to do with the location of the window.
The worst part was the feedback loop of feeling that I have to sleep, or else this study will be useless; then those feelings contributing to more sleeplessness.
I've been using the CPAP ever since, and now I sleep very well most of the time. I fall asleep in just a few minutes (used to lie awake for hours) I sleep all night through, and I often wake up a few minutes before my alarm goes off.
It might sound crazy, but mouth breathing is linked to ADHD and all kinds of issues, likely due to lower nitric oxide levels and less stimulation of the pituitary gland. Expect the field to grow in the next decade. Lots of us are now having problems because of the reduction of breast feeding, amongst other things.
One night a few weeks ago I tried the method of taping my mouth shut before going to sleep. I woke up the next day feeling super sick and lightheaded, presumably due to lack of oxygen. There definitely seems to be an issue with my nose breathing.
> now having problems because of the reduction of breast feeding
Do you have a link to any studies that indicate/confirm this?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20129889
It's not even a question of IF for those who are into this stuff. It's really a question of WHY for the researchers. But for those in the field, the solution is simple and you don't need to know the why, you just work around it (by nasal breathing!)
Here's some more that are more about the sleep apnea side of things:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12615622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14523179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15342852/
Point being: before you think you (or your kid) is "ADHD", see to it that they are breathing and sleeping properly. They're just so tired they become irritably unstable and unfocused. Lack of sleep = kids are a mess
In which case you confirm research findings, as babies tend to sleep light, wake up every few hours, then cry.
In all seriousness I doubt you can self asses this. Maybe I've miss-skimmed, but nothing in the article mentions about how participants felt, but rather how easy it was to wake them up.
If this really happens, then I guess I'll need to switch to a nomadic lifestyle. It's impossible for me to wake in the morning at home (so I'm always late in the office), but I have no trouble getting up early when on delegation abroad, sleeping in a hotel...
Speaking anecdotally, it works for me, and I wake up feeling more rested and less groggy.
I use this one: https://hello.is/
I bought a Mi-band specifically as a vibration alarm clock, as it's cheaper than any other such thing on the market, it follows you around, being strapped to your wrist (so you can always feel the vibration when the time comes) and has this useful feature where it monitors your movements and tries to wake you up in your light sleep.
If you have a regular weekly wakeup schedule you only need the app once, to program the band over Bluetooth, then you can just wear it as a night accessory and charge it every few months.
I use it in combination with those yellow spongy ear plugs, to get a bit of silence (locking the door to my bedroom, so that any intruder would hopefully make enough noise to wake me up through the ear plugs) but I suppose there are many use cases.
I know that Philips makes a crazy progressive light alarm clock that goes from dim to SUPER BRIGHT in the span of 10-15 minutes, designed to slowly wake you up by brightening up the room, but again I'm not sure how much light affects you, and it's actually really expensive.
[1]: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.urbandroid...
Additionally, all the stories about camping and hotel stay are situations in which other factors would influence sleep - strenuous hiking, sleep schedule mucked about by jet lag, etc.
Should be submitted as it's own article.