Hands-on: Ubuntu goes social, gains Me Menu in 10.04 alpha 3
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
No, do not want more and more stuff added to this or that. I would really like it if things would Just Work on more and more hardware, especially more recent hardware.
Fix the stuff that doesn't work quite right, and leave the rest alone. Let users add the bling they want later on.
It's like they're in some battle with Microsoft to see who can add the most superficial crap that gets in the way of just doing stuff.
It really is impressive that things work as well as they do, but OTOH, if Ubuntu is really going to be "desktop ready" then it has to support modern hardware.
I attempted an install of Ubuntu 9.10 on an HP box with a Dell LCD monitor and an nVidia graphics card, and though it started out OK, the screen eventually went black. Turns out there was no workable default video driver in place to allow even crude graphics. Even the text/low-res installation options failed.
I did finally get it running (assorted usage of virtual terminals and ftp'ing of driver), but hibernation and suspend still don't work. And gnome-terminal has acquired some bug where it never warns you if you're closing multiple tabs.
Maybe this is an apples-and-oranges deal, but when I read of new gee-whiz crap like twitter integration in the task bar, while core behavior such as hibernation is still a crapshoot, and key apps are buggy, it makes me wonder where the priorities are.
Perhaps I'm just bitter about KDE3 being dropped for the saccharine mess that is KDE4. :(
Bottom line seems to be that OSS developers, by and large, hate working on the mundane stuff, and much prefer to invent Really Cool Stuff, regardless of any real need for it.
Shouldn't bitch about stuff that's free, but I'd like to think the people calling the shots care if the end results are properly usable.
The Magic 8 ball is telling me "Xmonad looking REALLY good". :)
I documented my personal "get Ubuntu running via VirtualBox on XP" experience here: http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/10/get-started-building-we...
http://www.lispforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=588
to gauge demand. It didn't seem like there's much.
I still plan on eventually "completing" it, but at the moment I'm sick of trying to get Emacs to behave in some small ways like other editors.