It looks like a toy for people with poor eyesight.
It looks like a toy for people with poor eyesight.
Unix machines have traditionally been used with big monitors. It's not surprising at all Gnome uses lots of pixels.
And there is nothing forcing you to use Ubuntu's default layout. You have literally hundreds of options to choose from. I tend to change look and feel more or less on a monthly basis.
I use Ubuntu because I have the free time to screw around with my home computer, but I wouldn't recommend it for people who don't have the time and knowledge to do that, unless all they ever want to do is use what it comes with out of the box.
Most people don't. At the very least, most (non-geek) people don't switch desktop environments often. The people that are 'too busy' will just settle on a desktop environment and stick with it.
When running XP, as I still do on my non-Linux laptops, the total vertical space wastage at the top of Windows Explorer is 65 pixels, including title bar, toolbar, menu bar and location textbox. This is possible because on XP the toolbars and menu bars have customizable locations, unlike Vista and above - I have screenshots in my blog here:
http://blog.barrkel.com/2008/08/venting-on-vista.html
Unless you are talking about a pixel area somewhere in the region of 8000x3000 on high dpi screens, the Ubuntu proportions are nowhere near acceptable.
There's a trick to window management - I use cascading windows on the second monitor, as I detail here:
http://blog.barrkel.com/2009/11/on-difficulty-of-setting-win...