Hacker News Reader

Comment by buddylw | Hacker News Reader

I don't really 'trust' either company, but the fact that I'm in so deep with Google already makes me less hesitant to add this one thing.

Google already knows me. I've basically slept with Google, so seeing me naked is just not a big deal. If Google uses that against me or gets compromised by a third party I'm screwed anyway and the transcripts from my living room will be the least of my worries.

View on HN

Interesting take. I should rephrase this to say--I am less interested in allowing google to profit even more from me.

I don't really understand this motivation. Google profiting from your actions doesn't necessarily mean that you're losing something. It's not a zero sum game between you and Google, there are other actors in the system. A similar analogy would be how social systems are valued by their number of users. Their value is not coming from your pocket, you add value to them by being a user and they add value to you by providing you with some service that you enjoy (thus the reason you are a user of theirs). Granted, I understand if your reasoning is not wanting to "pay" more personal info to Google, I just wanted to point out that their profit has no net positive or negative impact on you in it's own right.

Biologically, you're much better off with commensal organisms that expect to have a long, profitable relationship with you, giving you things you want and benefiting from you in return, rather than organisms with a shorter time horizon.

> I don't really understand this motivation. Google profiting from your actions doesn't necessarily mean that you're losing something.

It has nothing to do with "I should also profit from my data" but rather, I want to contribute less to Google's dominance.

Google has become very powerful--it's in the top 10 of lobby spending in the US.

Their power is tied to their profits, and limiting my contribution of one, should limit my contribution to the other.

Ah okay. That's fair, I wasn't really considering it as an adversarial situation in terms of power. I was looking at it more from a "purchase this product" or not in an isolated decision.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com