The problem I see with this scenario is that not everyone is copy-pasting from the browser into a terminal. I for example copy things to my VM's text editor first, then run the command. Other could be copy-pasting to an email for example. In those instances it would be obvious that the site is doing something not so kosher and it would be notices pretty soon I guess, depending on the site's popularit
Try to copy one from this site for example.
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/albert_einstein....
"Please enable Javascript This site requires Javascript be enabled to provide you the best experience [for us]. Some features [like shoving crap into your clipboard] may not be available with Javascript disabled!"
It's not uncommon to find sites whose definition of "good UX" is exactly the opposite of what I want.
Twitter does this on every single tweeted link. For example copy the link in this tweet: https://twitter.com/twitter/status/727507892283142145
You don't see a https:// on the page, but it gets put on your clipboard because it is actually there with 0 font size. In this case it's actually pointless though because they cut off the end of the url.
It defangs this vulnerability nicely.
echo hacked > hacked.txt; echo -ne '\033[1F\033[2K'
echo innocent --preserve-root
do not remove '/' (default) sudo rm -rf /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/
(no, don't run that at home)