It is certainly not FUD, see https://www.eff.org/cases/oracle-v-google
The point is, Oracle have decided to sue once over usage of something they bought and may do so again in the future.
The point is, Oracle have decided to sue once over usage of something they bought and may do so again in the future.
The legal situation of Google's use of Java APIs was always a tiny bit murky, but it was super-clear-cut compared to the use of ZFS-on-Linux.
Here is a legal opinion on the matter:
https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2016/linux-kernel-...
And here's to hoping that ZFS becomes so widespread that Oracle themselves end up redistributing it in their version of Linux, like they did with DTrace.