Flippaper – draw your own pinball game on paper
sewergadget.tumblr.com
sewergadget.tumblr.com
Then I read the comments and watched the second video. I get the backlash over the misogyny. But I wonder if focusing too much on that is throwing the baby out with the bath water. Without knowing anything else, the scenario that popped into my head was a team of creators who are really good at a few things, but at the expense of being completely incompetent at marketing, social issues, website design, being classy in general...
But should this invention be squashed for their mistakes or lauded for its brilliance?
Sometimes I think really innovative and brilliant things come from people who have ultra-focused to the point of being very good at a few things and sucking at many other things... And the sucking at many other things is the cost that must be paid.
Analysis: http://imgur.com/a/gCj8R
EDIT: stranger, you are going to need to defend your down-vote. Watch the video, see the cartoon milk squirting breasts. Click on the creator links. Look at their tumblrs. Look at their aesthetic. Discuss the issue. Sorry if the content that they put in their video makes you uncomfortable, but it is on-topic for this post and I'm pointing out that it is there
Here you go http://imgur.com/a/gCj8R
EDIT: Again with the down-votes? I took actual screenshots and captioned (with very little editorial) what is going on in the video. Why would you down-vote that?
That is not even close to being an objective analysis.
I down-voted. I also watched one of the videos and read the article without noticing any lactating breasts. Nevertheless I think this is the art style, and neither you or I have to view it or like it. I'm really clueless as to which hat you pulled tech industry misogyny out off.
> stranger, you are going to need to defend your down-vote.
> Watch the video, see the cartoon milk squirting breasts. Click on the creator links. Look at their tumblrs. Look at their aesthetic. Discuss the issue. Sorry if the content that they put in their video makes you uncomfortable, but it is on-topic for this post and I'm pointing out that it is there
The entire bulk of GP's edits are in imperative form, and give a very strong impression of exactly that: condescending moralizing - I could be wrong, but given how rare repeated imperatives in English are, I would like to know why you think otherwise.
At worst this is a spoof of second-rate 80's production. Though without your comments most people probably wouldn't have even noticed.
I think you have yet to make an argument as to why this is an issue and needs to be the focus of the discussion rather than the tech.
When intent determines whether an act is right or wrong I believe I'm asking the wrong question.