> either a recorded conversation, a verifiable conversation on text/whatsapp/email, a photo or in extreme cases a rape kit.
It sounds good in theory, but the definition of sexual advance is vague.
The investor will be thinking - what if some day you feel that you just want to take back the shares, how easily could you action this clause and what protections do I have?
If we're talking a lost court case against the investor, then yeah that works and is solid. If you want to action the clause without that then who will be judging if the recording/photo etc. qualifies under the sexual advance claim?