> The results show that our approach generates largely accurate API sequences

OK then, humans still needed. Best case, it seems AI will take up what one would consider interesting work (algorithms, thinking) and humans will end up doing grunt work -- testing out bugs, cleaning up data, formatting data, explaining to other humans etc.

Realistically though, this just creates two API's (instead of one) for humans to master, the original API and the 99% accurate machine API and knowing where the gap/bugs are.