The Internet is nominated for this year's Nobel Peace Prize.
news.bbc.co.uk
news.bbc.co.uk
Kissinger, Arafat, a newly-inaugurated president who justified the wars he was continuing in his acceptance speech, and now a communications medium.
Retire the Peace Prize. They clearly have no idea what to do with it.
The Nobel Peace Prize can serve a very real purpose; it can highlight someone working peacefully to overthrow an authoritarian regime. It can give those advocating for an improvement of the human condition a voice, international standing, a modicum of protection from government violence, and resources.
Using the Peace Prize (and the Economics Prize, for that matter) as a way to deliver short-sited political digs or kudos to one group or another is farcical. It should go to people who are on the ground, working right now, to make the world a better place.
No doubt. The internet is a passive tool; it's the people and organizations using it for good who should be winning prizes. The Nobel Peace Prize should be less nebulous, and for concrete achievement. (Edited for grammar.)
Western Europe was liberated by military organizations. The resulting several decades of peace had something to do with military organizations as well.
Short of Norman Borlaug, military organizations have produced more peace than anyone else.
I hadn't noticed that the world is different due to the internet.
But, I want my 0.0013 of an SEK.