The point is that it mimics a natural conversation. Do you refuse to speak just because no one is recording you?
The conversation analogy that xux made seems perfectly reasonable to me in that regard. However, it is (depending on the user, I suppose) not super "real-time" the way conversations are.
With Snapchat you aren't "creating" anything, just having casual conversations.
I will also admit that I was of the same opinion as GP comment. However, this analogy of yours just blew my mind -- I've never thought of it that way!
People usually don't save chat log, or rewind it. Snapchat is the same, the proper name.
I was got me wondering why this company is success, what human need it solves, now things is getting a little more clear.
I'll use this as my retort to anyone who says they don't want their content to disappear
If such was cheap and easy, I'd do it 24/7. I hate that my brain's storage is so volatile, and I wish I remembered dead people better. But yeah GP is still a good point, my desire is a separate issue from not wanting one's efforts to 'go to waste' by not being preserved. An honest introspection will reveal just how much is 'wasted' all the time from that point of view, it's far more than just ephemeral updates or unrecorded and unremembered speech.
I got what you mean, and now I comprehend a little better what human need Snapchat is solving, thank you.
It's like a conversation, and it's pointless to use when no one is listening you.