> A whole company going after one person.
No, just their PR department
> Whether they are right or wrong makes is irrelevant compared to the door to ...
I vehemently disagree. Being wrong or right is probably the most relevant part of this.
> ... company bullying it opens: if a customer speaks against a company right or wrongfully the arsenal of legal retaliation a company has against him/her is disproportionate (libeling, doxing, mass PR/reputation, secrecy of affair new laws)
As far as I know, Tesla has not filed suit, or in any other way bullied Mr. Niedermayer.
> resulting in de facto possibility for companies to control public space communication.
Again, I see nothing here that indicates Tesla controls the public space. Quite the opposite. They have to publish on the same playing field as their detractors. The field has never been so level as it is now on the Internet.
> Government are just giving the key of censorship to corporation. Private owned interests that do not represent the people.
Tesla and its owner's arrogance are creepy.
That may or may not be true, but this blog post is hardly the hook to hang your point on. It sounds more like you have an axe to grind here with that last sentence. But that's just my personal reading of it.