The total disregard that journalists have shown for facts in this saga should be a red flag that they're equally full of it when it comes to reporting on things that we aren't so knowledgeable about.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/05/...
And for anybody having doubts about Wright:
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/03/the-cryptographically-pro...
https://www.nikcub.com/posts/craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-nak...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge
I remember watching this happen as a teenager via two sources of information: BBSes and the early Internet, and the mainstream media.
The mainstream media told me Weaver was a child abusing neo-Nazi cult leader who was stockpiling weapons to conduct terrorist attacks or overthrow the government or something.
The non-mainstream media told me he was a reclusive survivalist eccentric that may or may not have harbored some white supremacist beliefs (goofy or offensive beliefs are not a crime) who was being taken down dramatically in a frantic attempt by said government officials to cover their rear ends for a botched entrapment attempt.
History proved the former to be all lies and the latter to be largely the truth.
I never really trusted the news again. Stuff like this just proves my teenaged loss of faith was right. Newspapers and TV media are just "some guy's blog."
That is not to say I trust the "alt" media either. It's media too and over time I've seen it become more and more full of crap as money has come into the equation. Now it seems like mostly a sales channel for dodgy "natural" pharmaceuticals and populist political propaganda.
As Mulder would say: "trust no one." :)
In the end it's just made me an equal opportunity skeptic.