The whole article is about making a way more important, but also recognizing that valid concerns deserve to be addressed.
Balance.
That's because this is the best way to contribute to a team effort that is already underway. If and when my expertise is required for something I'm quite sure the other team members will know how to reach me.
I'm not sure what you intend to gain with misinterpreting what I wrote but it makes no sense to me. Enjoy HN.
The irony, here, is that you continue to explain your position as different from the article's author, then upon elaboration it's clear that you're disagreeing with her terms by some strange default.
You're not bonkers, but jayzus you're weird.