Investor sentiment around developer tools in Silicon Valley is still broadly negative. I worked for 3yrs at a company funded by prominent valley VCs and, unequivocally, they were trying to get us out of the "developer tools" business and "sell more to the enterprise market". The subtext being, "developers don't control budget in real companies".
And I think there's a grain of truth to that sentiment. You have to realize how much Twilio is a company built against the prevailing Silicon Valley wisdom of "how companies are built". These guys have a bit of a counterculture narrative, of "we're a developer tools company, we're growing, we're having a successful IPO, see, it can be done".
I, for one, think it's a great, harmless PR stunt. :)
Sell NYSE:TWLO!
I love Twilio and wish the best for them with their IPO but having lived through the 1999 dotcom crash, publicity stunts and stock price hubris rub me the wrong way.
Another way it could have happened: some engineer nerded out, and said at a team meeting "can I live code from the NYSE trade floor? It's silly but would be super fun!". To which marketing replies "yeah, and that'd be great for the company image too- do it!".
You seem to interpret it as the first version, but for all we know it could be the second. Something that would not be out of line with the personality of someone like Woz either.
First, by being developers. The first word in our title was "developer" and each of us had 10+ years of serious ship-it experience on projects large and small from all over various industries. Even if we didn't know that specific problem, we had shared experiences and mindsets.
Next, by treating everyone with respect. It didn't matter if you were in a "boring" job behind the scenes or the most amazing job with accolades and attention or the person making the purchasing decision, you are someone to be treated with dignity and respect.
Finally, by being hero makers. That was our internal code name at the time. Our job was not to promote ourselves and get our names out there. It was to help make that developer, that hacker, that entrepreneur be admired and a hero in their organization. That meant helping them design, build, and ship useful tools quickly that would work today, tomorrow, and a year from now.
My 0.02.
> May be I am old school when I think we should all be rolling like Wozniak's (apple co-founder) not flashy brogrammers who would do anything for marketing.
Woz would be a no one without marketing. And similarly Jobs would be a no one with Woz's product development. I'm not sure why you feel the need to address "has marketing gone too far" when you can simply chose to ignore it?
I think people get caught up in the product, and forget that sales is just as important to the core business.
In fact the whole purpose of having a stock exchange floor is 100% marketing. The real action happens in a colo in New Jersey; the trading floor only exists for the cameras and the NYSE would carry on perfectly fine without one.
Apple wouldn't be Apple if it rolled like Woz.