Tourists before AirBnB would simply not visit somewhere if the hotel price was beyond what they could afford.
Is there any justification at all that could prioritise tourists over residents for living space?
Is there any justification at all that could prioritise tourists over residents for living space?
Empirically it seems like cities value tourists over residents -- if cities actually wanted residents, they'd approve construction of housing for them.
How does that work? Don't tourists use the same infrastructure?
http://gothamist.com/2013/04/11/interactive_chart_nycs_budge...
(I'm assuming "debt" and "pensions" are allocated proportionally.)