Let's assume that every single entry on the list is accurate.
Why is Thomson Reuters maintaining a list like this?
Why would payment to Thomson Reuters be the only filter to access a list like this?
Why is Thomson Reuters maintaining a list like this?
Why would payment to Thomson Reuters be the only filter to access a list like this?
It's ironic that an anti-terrorism list is been used by brutal, foreign regimes to co-op British banks and institutions into harassing people whose only "crime" has been becoming members of groups they don't like.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/28/finsbury-par...