The prejudice is strong with this one.
edit: Changed "racism" to "prejudice"
The prejudice is strong with this one.
edit: Changed "racism" to "prejudice"
There was a meeting scheduled to go over it, but it was on Google Calendar...
I don't see what distinction you're trying to make. Is it somehow more acceptable to be prejudice against an entire religion than it is to be prejudice against an entire race? Is that really the discussion you want to have, that some prejudice is acceptable and other prejudice is not?
Choice and agency is the standard by which most people draw the line between generic prejudice and hate. It's no coincidence that gay rights dramatically improved along with widespread acceptance that, regarding sexual orientation, "I was born this way".
A less snarky answer is that just like Jews there is a separation of cultural Muslims and religious Muslims, the former representing a race.
Back to the point, certain religions are so ingrained culturally and politically that people start to identify themselves culturally and ethnically with the faith because of the people's shared ethical values, history and background. This would have also happened with Christianity if it weren't for the fact that it's the 'default' in the western world.
A person who grows up in the Muslim world, is taught Islamic history, is raised with Islamic values, and practices national and ethnic 'rituals'^1, but is nonreligious might choose to identify themselves as racially Muslim but not religiously.
Conversely a light skinned person in predominately Christian area who finds Islam later in life might say they are racially white, American, or identify with their ancestors ethnicity, but identify themselves as religiously Muslim.
^1 Despite the connotation this isn't necessarily religious. The 4th of July celebration in the US is a ritual.