How is it coerced? The author reports the facts exactly as they are.
If the author had instead attempted to tie this to, say, past security breaches caused by hackers operating out of China, then that would be framing the situation in a coerced way.
If the author had instead attempted to tie this to, say, past security breaches caused by hackers operating out of China, then that would be framing the situation in a coerced way.
Man kills man.
Man kills black man.
White man kills black man.
Assuming the facts are all the same, do you understand how the selective informing of facts frames the readers understanding or impression of the issue?
Thanks for the downvote though.
Human kills human.
Life form kills life form.
At what point does it end? You are splitting hairs and I think you know it.
You are splitting hairs and I think you know it.
No, not really. I'm explaining how a fact can impart bias. Not sure why this is such a difficult concept to understand.