Google twists the knife, asks for sanctions against Oracle attorney
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I fully understand that private companies have a right to keep things secret. But I also believe that people should have a right to know about the things that affect them. And somehow I think it's important to know that the default search engine on my phone might not only be there because its the best one, but because they pay the most.
I hope more lawyers start mentioning random tidbits like this...
And does it really help you to know that there's a deal between Google and Apple? It was already public knowledge that Google payed a lot of money to Mozilla for making the default in Firefox. Did you think Apple did it for free or something?
And how exactly does that influence your choices as a customer? Does that make their search engine worse somehow?
I doubt that it can make a difference for a majority of people. For one because it's not newsworthy, I mean, a majority of people don't care about privacy either, let alone worrying about having their choices influenced. But also because Google's search engine is objectively the best search engine and disbelievers should simply try local searches in Europe for a taste of the huge margin of how Google's search beats its competition. And the same can be said of Google Maps actually. Maybe they've integrated it with Waze or something, but it's really smart about traffic and alternative routes lately, not to mention that it's the only one that can keep up with the one-way streets in my city. Apple might have rolled their own solution, but it really sucks by comparison. And the iPhone owners in my city install Google Maps anyway.
All the industry insiders probably know how much the licensing fees are; it's the public that they don't want to find out.
As I think I can easily prove Andorid is a copy of Java.
If you can do better than millions of dollars worth of Oracle lawyers, you are indeed a most impressive specimen.
Can't say that in front of the children.
Naked figures, eww, yucky.
If all agreements between public companies and other entities had to be public then the playing field would be more level and the figures in this case would have already been public.
The big companies (and TLAs) have good intelligence, as shown.
Small businesses and the public ... well, tough luck.
Dump a ton of bricks on the clumsy oaf that blew the gaff.
They don't have "good intelligence". They had access to Google's confidential information specifically for the purposes of discovery in this trial. That's why Google is asking for sanctions. They basically abused the discovery process and revealed privileged data that they should not have.
Can't say I know theirs.