Why? It's true. Most tend to go to one extreme of the quality spectrum or another. A small number of companies and people find middle grounds that knock out serious problems while maintaining time to market. Then, can keep fixing stuff in reasonable time before it becomes a big problem due to design & policies being made to do that. These groups trying to go all in on unproven stuff really should dial down the innovation a little bit for caution and peer review in its place. Smaller-scale experiments before the big ones (eg DAO), too.