Unless these armed guards are actively serving in an army, they are civilians.
I think you know what I meant. Random civilian owning a military weapon vs someone who's job it is to use it for security.
So what if he has several military style rifles; the more power to him. I probably have more though.
I think you misunderstand. I admire the man and respect his right to own his weapons and defend himself while he's out there in the middle of nowhere on his own. I was simply pointing out that it's natural for someone to be slightly wary of a civilian with assault weapons.
I apologize. Just irks me to see the article complaining about a guy with guns in the middle of nowhere.
You mean the six hour safety course?
The CDG "guards" are soldiers on active military duty, IIRC.
You mean whether they're prosecuted if they shoot someone?
Think about it, they are wearing uniforms. They are so official it must be ok.