That also assumes that the market equilibrium for every job is at least $70,000, which it probably is not.
Over my career, the saddest, most stuck employees have been those whose salaries outstrip anything they could get if they go back on the market. It's wise to think carefully before accepting a salary that is much higher than normal, because it's likely that you'll have a very difficult time leaving.
Otherwise you should have a huge safety net when you finally decide to switch jobs to something that makes you happier.
It's almost as if people enjoy luxuries.
I assume you live in a rented bedroom and eat mostly packaged ramen while saving 90% of your take-home pay?
When someone says something like "I don't understand why people spend all their money", it's just pretension. They know exactly why people spend all their money. Money buys nice things and nice experiences. It's a good idea to live beneath your means, but it's a different thing to pretend that typical behavior is somehow incomprehensible.
Also, buying quality doesn't stop you from spending all your money. It is extremely easy to spend all your money on quality stuff that you don't really need and justify it as "buying quality" or "buying once".
> The reality is that people tend to spend most or all of what they earn. People like to own nice homes and nice vehicles and take nice vacations etc etc.
Aren't these statements contradictory? My point was that it's obvious that a lot of people don't know this, and you CAN avoid living from paycheck to paycheck.
I did it when I was a student (with no help from parents) and had at most $400 a month after rent, and I do it now that I make a lot more. I however still don't go out a ton, and I don't have a fancy car, or purchase anything on a contract, because the luxury part doesn't give me any happiness. I still eat great food and have people over and travel as much as I can.
I find this obvious. You do to. My OP was about people not.
Go ask any general practice doctor whether people do what they "should" and whether the reason when they don't is actually ignorance. People have lots of trouble prioritizing long term benefits over immediate pleasures.
It does: it means financial independence -- and the freedom to work on what I really want to do -- comes quickly as opposed to never coming at all.
> The reality is that people tend to spend most or all of what they earn.
Read Amy Chua's _World on Fire_, on the question of market-dominant minorities -- i.e., peoples who have too much sense to waste their money like this.
> quality stuff that you don't really need
The difference between old money and the rest of the US is the difference between checking the time on your cellphone (the old-money way) and buying, or wanting to buy, a $20,000 Patek Philippe mechanical watch.