Repairing the only known prototype of Nintendo PlayStation [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
Next, he doesn't have a microscope? Using a hand magnifier instead. Ok. Then he's clamping to the PCB for scope ground instead of soldering a fly lead for that purpose.
He doesn't want to use desoldering braid on this "one of a kind" board, so he's heating and levering the caps off. That's a recipe for a lifted trace for certain. Then there's the iron. That thing is way way too large for what he's trying to do.
I know, I know, he fixed it.
Before you yell at me, I've been doing this stuff for 30 years and I'm here to tell you I'm shocked that he doesn't have better equipment. The thing is, the guy is talented. If you coupled that with decent equipment, he'd be amazing.
To any budding hardware hackers, a benchtop (or rackmount, because they can be had for very cheap if they're old) power supply is one of the FIRST thing you should buy, probably before you get an oscilloscope, and probably right after you get a soldering iron.
edit: Actually, at 3:00, isn't that a bench supply that is sitting in front of him?
edit2: And at about 7:34 you can actually see the terminals for it.
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/does-a-hobbyist-need-a-ben...
4 hour video on theory of operation and fix of CD drive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZK3Rmerg1I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCd40Ac87qE
I think "The thing is, the guy is talented. If you coupled that with decent equipment, he'd be amazing." sounds a little patronizing.
Ya know, I'm gonna go with the guy who is successfully doing this stuff vs the guy who says he's doing it wrong.
When anything electronic is submitted people are interested and encouraging even if the quality of construction is terrible, like it was built by a drunk monkey.
But when some code / script / stylesheet is submitted you get a mix of the same interest and encouragement, and also some really fierce critique. "My god who wrote that css float, a drunk monkey?"
I prefer the first approach, btw. There are ways of delivering constructive criticism and HN isn't always great at it.
EDIT: FEC / Element 14 are sponsoring a bunch of DIY electronic stuff at the moment. So while he could use a $400 electronics microscope it's in their interest to show him using cheaper stuff that's more available to student tinkerers. Those hand loupes and magnifiers are very cheap and handy for students.
(EDIT: And I'm not saying Ben Heck's builds are bad.)
The other thing is, in programming you can do pretty much anything for free. Whether you want to write scripts when drunk or employ highest industry standards of quality, the only limit is your knowledge (and how much you care). In case of electronics, doing anything professional-grade gets extremely expensive very fast, so all we - the subset of HN for which hardware is just a hobby - can do is hobby-level work.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/unreleased-snes-playstat...
Ben Heck has some impressive videos in general, watching him work always makes me wish I was better at electronics.
That said the system feels like a slightly pimped SNES (mosty the embedded ram in the cartridge), so there's not a lot to expect from it.
[0] http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/07/play-a-homebrew-game-d...
This is why so many console recapping services exist online.