That sounds like BS.
Presumably the blog was only deleted because there's already some review procedure in place, and it found something that can't be distributed.
Presumably the blog was only deleted because there's already some review procedure in place, and it found something that can't be distributed.
I thought it was obvious from context that I was referring to the specific case in the article.
Anyway, I don't think the general case you're describing makes sense or is very realistic. It's impossible to know some part of the data collection can't be distributed without somebody or something looking at it. Either the person reporting it, or the algorithm flagging it should be able to identify the specific data items that can't be distributed.