Hacker News Reader

Comment by crack-the-code | Hacker News Reader

Yes but even prior to this, Rackspace had been a managed cloud provider, meaning they offer services on top of the infrastructure. This is different than AWS.

View on HN

RAX has its roots in managed cloud, but they moved away from that. They got into IaaS, but have retrenched. Here's RAX's mapping of AWS to RAX P&S for IaaS [0]. That's a lot. RAX has decided to return to its roots (managed cloud) and seek differentiation because it can't compete on IaaS.[1] That'll be tough.

RAX's going private to shift its P&S mix and turn things around.

edit: I'll also point to jsode's great comment above.

[0] https://support.rackspace.com/how-to/mapping-of-amazon-web-s...

[1] http://www.networkworld.com/article/2461361/iaas/rackspace-b...

Rackspace's IaaS offering was never close to what AWS, Azure or even GCE offer.

It was more similar to DigitalOcean or Vultr, who are not really IaaS but VPS providers. I mean, where are the VPCs? the incredibly redundant load balancing? the VPN gateways, etc?

Disclaimer: It has been 2 years since I evaluated RAX's offerings.

Rackspace offers most of the services Amazon/Google/Microsoft does - but you're right, they did start out as Slicehost which is a Linode competitor (back in what...2009?)

Isn't 'managed cloud' kind of contradictory?

Shouldn't your cloud based application manage itself? That's kind of the point, not having to 'manage' it?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com