Outsourced Grading, With Supporters and Critics, Comes to College
chronicle.com
chronicle.com
It is crazy that we have folks with e.g. master's degrees in history marking 90 copies of the same "connect the term with the definition" homework assignment when it could be done by anybody capable of reading. (The cost of having a 40 year old teacher with a master's degree mark that homework assignment is, as a ballpark number, about $150. It could be done by a Midwestern housewife with a master's degree for $20 if you let her work from home, or for $10 if you outsourced it overseas.)
That avoids the larger problem of "Why did we assign that?", of course. (And the unions will, predictably, never go for it.)
Educational services are quickly becoming a global market. Quick example. Our CTO was less of a believer in the power of MTurk. We (www.nixty.com) were converting a physics course from MIT. The tests were in PDF form. (a. problems; b. solutions). We wanted them to be in multiple choice form. No one on the team had the capability to create relevant multiple choice responses. We created a HIT on MTurk. A guy from Bangalore signed up for the HIT. He had a Master's in Science and had taught Physics earlier in his career. He banged out the multiple choice responses in a day. We had them cross-checked and they were solid. Pretty cool, right?
The real question is why she has a budget for only 7 TAs, "some of whom did not have much experience", in a class which is in part serving as remedial English. At best that's 125 students per TA ... and again I'd expect to be able to get very little communication with whichever one was assigned to me at that sort of ratio.
Something has to give, and if the subject matter really counts, maybe this is one of the less bad choices.
Obviously for all the usual reasons she's getting a lot of students who aren't good at reading, and it's not clear to me that they'd be better served by a generic remedial English class instead of having to write more real world stuff in her's.
Also a "you get what you pay for" problem; perhaps we shouldn't expect better from a 2nd tier or lower state schools (e.g. below the University of Texas system (for which I have some affection from a NSF Summer Science Training Program at UT Austin I attended in high school) and I'd guess below the Texas A&M system).