Time is an important factor here, more for employees than, say, investors because you don't have a portfolio of multiple lives. Several years of your life count for a lot; be clear-eyed about where they're going.
Time is an important factor here, more for employees than, say, investors because you don't have a portfolio of multiple lives. Several years of your life count for a lot; be clear-eyed about where they're going.
They can - that's what early exercise is. If you exercise on the day you are granted the options (not they day they vest - the day you join the company) your spread is zero, so your tax liability on that is zero.
Of course, you still have to pay the strike price out of pocket, but the IRS doesn't take anything (yet).
> Codified at 26 U.S.C. § 83(b), this election lets you decide at the start of your vesting agreement to be taxed for the entire amount that will eventually vest at the present value. Rather than paying tax each year then, you pay all the tax up front based on the value of the stock when it was granted to you. In order to make this election, you have to send a letter to the IRS within 30 days of the grant being made.
Why does this have to be either-or? Never understood that
Not sure a lot of VCs would back that.. as they can find another founder to work for 95k and 20% equity. Your pay cut would fund 3 more engineers.
If you really want lots of equity and lots of pay, you need to bootstrap and be patient and be a rockstar. I don't see other ways to get there.
One or the other. But not 0.02% and half the pay...
The choice to underpay and offer lottery tickets in lieu is a conscious, deliberate one by the founder/investor class, and hey, if you can't get enough suckers from amongst the Workers you can always lobby Congress to increase the H1B cap and let you import some from overseas...
Not long ago, someone from a code camp negotiated 250k total annual compensation from an SF short-term rental company.
Yeah.