Hacker News Reader

Comment by tinus_hn | Hacker News Reader

Do not attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. I see no conspiracy here, just an OEM that doesn't get it.

View on HN

You're quoting Hanlon's Razor.. But this could also be Hanlon's Dodge(https://cluelesscreationcorporation.quora.com/When-the-burea...)... I'm not saying it is, but it could be.

Never knew this principle had a name. Will have to try to remember it. Of course for us plebeians, it is oft heard "ignorance is no excuse".

I would love a resource that related the various notions, expressions and idioms of society in the way that you just did. The sophistication of this association is well beyond anything machine learning can do. Except for maybe to crawl the internet and determine it was a relevant association stated by some human somewhere.

The quote is attributed to Napoleon, who surely saw his fair share of incompetent generals. It should really be called Napoleons Razor to fall in line with Occam.

Who is this Hanlon guy anyway.

I'm really not much of a conspiracy theorist, but such things (which require extensive engineering) do not happen by accident in large companies.

We're assuming Microsoft is behaving according to their extensively-documented (including original MS source documents in court cases) past malicious behaviour, not assuming malice in the absence of previous malice.

The kids these days don't realise just how much of what's fucked up about PCs these days is directly Microsoft fuckery.

Groklaw's pages on the Comes case are a good start: http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20070220083801...

>Do not attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

Except where malice has previously been proven, in which case go wild.

I agree. Seems as if a service rep made silly mistake and likely got fired for the negative PR. :/

That was Hanlon's razor there, for those who halfway remember it like me.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com