Wow, yeah. The first section is Merb ... ok. Then there's a ROR subsection of Merb. Um, what? And the first paragraph of the ROR subsection clearly was copied and pasted from some consultancy's "Our decicated RoR developers can create web 2.0 applications using latest Ruby on Rails web services." (Ok, not quite copied and pasted. They managed to work in a typo ("decicated").)

And then the paragraph immediately after that doesn't follow at all. It starts:

>When he [Brian Mastenbrook] was able to reproduce the glitch at Basecamp, he began to suspect that the flaw was inherent to Ruby on Rails, the popular Web framework used by both websites.

Did they do QA before launching this thing?