Nasa to reveal 'surprising' activity on Jupiter's moon Europa
phys.org
phys.org
If you pay attention, you can almost always tell if a movie is a low budget production, but the good ones don't feel like one.
But in Europa Report, that's evident through and through
I've noticed that too and found the difference to be largely not enough time spent (or no time spent) on post processing (color grading, adding film grain, etc) and sound (both foley and simple-to-produce atmospheric music).
These things are all cheap to do yourself, yet often neglected for some reason. They never skimp on this in big budget productions and so you get that "big budget cinematic look".
But color grading is far from the easy but neglected icing on the cake. I've been to an editing studio and it's amazing how it's essential to the story sometimes.
I really enjoyed the movie. Mood wise it's somewhere between Apollo 13 and Contact.
Overall, I'd say Interstellar works much better in movie form, although perhaps that is partly due to the scale of the concepts it employs compared to The Martian, which is smaller and more technical.
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/hubble-europa-water-vapo...
Sturgeon's Law, etc. There are a ton of great Twitter communities. Just don't ever click on a trending hashtag or read the replies of someone with >1M followers.
"The Galileo mission, launched in 1989, provided the bulk of current data on Europa. No spacecraft has yet landed on Europa, ..."
So far, we've been following instructions.
Well it's actually PR exploiting this race, not just the newspapers themselves.
http://www.popsci.com/europa-or-bust (Sep 2015)