[1] http://mavulture.com/political-corruption/mother-of-the-nati...
[1] http://mavulture.com/political-corruption/mother-of-the-nati...
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court...
[2] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianoce...
[3] https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/video-jirongo-narrates-how-ru...
"The KWS, charged with protecting Kenya’s game, is accused of consistently underestimating the threat, and Paul Kipkoech, its head of security in Tsavo, claimed in an interview that only 20 elephants had been killed in the park this year. But conservationists say the figure in Tsavo is much higher, perhaps as much as three or four times that. The Tsavo Trust, which runs aerial surveillance of the park, said in its November report that it had discovered six elephants shot dead by poachers that month alone."
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/elephant-appeal-...
But I do also second your question: Why is this on HN? It is pretty common knowledge that overhunting + poaching and poor game management are the primary reason for the loss of megafauna on the African contient.
edit: People thought my first statement was snark - it isn't. I genuinely had no idea that poaching / corruption was that high up the chain.
I don't find that something which is common knowledge - that poaching + habitat loss is the single driving force behind the loss of African (and other) megafauna - to be news.
We (zoologists) have known this for a long, long time.
However, enough readers of HN did find it interesting for it to make it to the front page. Maybe widespread understanding of the issues amongst non-experts isn't considered important for zoologists. I have no idea. But it's clearly interesting to some people.
In any case, you never know what discussion sparks insight. Poaching is driven by demand. Perhaps a campaign like the superman vs KKK could be employed.
I will keep that in mind on all my comments going forward.