Yeah, it's a weird dynamic. For example, the higher the price of oil, the less dependent the US is on the rest of the world. Lots of oil in that $60-$80+ range in and around the US.
On top of that, politics can make price swings a useful weapon. Cheap Oil makes Russia for example far weaker.
PS: IMO, small scale Russian aggression actually fits as a 'wag the dog' distraction from how bad things are going for them.
Let's hope they keep it small and don't try to covertly start a big fire that will drive oil prices back up. It's scary to see a world economic situation where starting/fueling wars starts to make more and more economic sense... I can almost imagine a future "WarEnron" selling the future profits indirectly caused by future wars :)
We should find a way to make sure we have profits aligned with peace and abolish the concept of "wars that make economic sense"! The US and EU at least do this (more or less unintentionally) by keeping weapons and military operations very expensive. Russia probably has more practical means for "cheap destruction" and this is dangerous because at some point some will start placing bets on this and then try nudging world events in the direction of their "win".
Pretty sure you just described every fund that's big into Honeywell, General Dynamics, Lockheed, etc. Many of these companies profits depend on the US insisting on maintaining the largest military in the world (by a lot) as a hedge against just these sorts of "profit wars" from being waged.
[1] Price of Oil Chart: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILWTICO [2] Dolar Chart: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DTWEXM