Life at Google
tbray.org
tbray.org
The man takes his job seriously.
Glad you're enjoying your new career....(but pssst: your life isn't really very interesting).
Doeney "The only supervillian I would take a bullet for"
> But, if you like your work, it’s sure easy to get through a whole lot each day
In other words, you're not the intended audience. If you can find value, so be it. If not, it's not the author's fault or problem.
By the way, I think you missed a healthy dose of sarcasm in the post, but nevermind.
And, I'm not saying the author has committed any fault. I am pointing out a problem he has: his ego.
Postscript: This is a little unfair. Normal people with lives in the neighborhood, aren’t doing this every day or even most days.
On the other hand, I wasn't even offered Google housing when relocating. Bah.
http://articles.sfgate.com/2008-06-05/business/17163317_1_go...
It's the use as an adjective that's disconcerting. But as you stated, sounds fun in a way.
It's great to avoid employees worrying about non-work stuff. It's a bit big brotherish in a way too, but soooo comfy. Where did I put my soma again?
I don't understand this attitude at all. You spend a quarter of the week at work (not including travel time or overtime, 40hr work week). Would you rather work at a shitty company that didn't try and keep you happy?
And really, it's your productivity that pays for that shuttle, housing, cafeteria, etc. Would you rather have it all go to the execs of the company? Or would you rather have it spent on making your work environment better?
Because if they do, I get the feeling he'd belt it out with enthusiasm.
The main character is held prisoner in a perfect but isolated village where he can eat perfect breakfasts and meet friendly people. Except that the village authorities expect from him "information" ;-)
However, I find that some of my best ideas and inspiration come from talking to people outside the technology field. I would be concerned that there's an echo chamber effect that could slant their ideas toward people like themselves instead of people outside Google.
Based on the last couple of sentences, I guess my reaction might just be based on Tim's hyperbole, though.
For instance in the dl's, any third-party criticism would be quickly followed up belittling the critic's remarks. While disparaging the competition is common of misc-eng in any company, the habit of blaming the user seems more ingrained at Google than elsewhere in my experience. So when someone speaks up, it is immediately dismissed instead of considered.
A lot of people at Google do non-Google things too. I know people training for marathons, doing comedy classes, living in flatshares with 4 artists, etc. But Google's main principle is to design for people like us (everything's tested internally before release), so the cosy bubble isn't all that bad.
Pun intended?