Show HN: Insight AI – 7 week fellowship for scientists and engineers
insightdata.ai
insightdata.ai
This past year, we've seen more highly specialized applied AI / deep learning roles emerge in the industry. We're also increasingly receiving applications from scientists and engineers who have some machine learning experience and are learning to build out sophisticated deep learning models during their time at Insight. The new Insight AI [4] program will focus on allowing Fellows with these backgrounds implement the latest ML techniques from research or contribute to open source projects under the guidance of industry leaders, then join AI teams in Silicon Valley and New York after the program. Insight AI will accept both software engineers and quantitative scientists (no PhD required).
[1] Data Science: http://insightdatascience.com
[2] Health Data: http://insighthealthdata.com
[3] Data Engineering: http://insightdataengineering.com
[4] Artificial Intelligence: http://insightdata.ai
I think one thing that's tricky about artificial intelligence as a field is that it involves so many diverse pre-requisites. For example, although Caffe lets you configure a DNN with just a simple text file, when something goes wrong, the stack traces are all in C++. The abstractions tend to leak.
I know that both software engineers and quantitative scientists are encouraged to apply. On the quantitative scientist side, what level of programming ability do you think somebody needs to succeed in the program?
Likewise, on the software engineer side, what level of mathematical background would you expect someone to have coming in?
The software engineers coming into the program would have machine learning experience, but have not necessarily in a full-time role yet. Just like the software engineers that come into our data engineering program, it’s a chicken or the egg problem: employers want to see experience in the role before hiring for it, but how can you get experience if no one wants to take a chance on hiring you. Insight takes that chance, you work on cutting edge ML problems here, then the company has evidence (obviously combined with your previous years of work experience) to than make a bet to bring you on as an ML engineer.
Overall AI practitioners in these roles usually fall along a spectrum, having their main strength be either software engineering or quantitative research. Often companies will have experts on both ends work together to implement current research and then put those models into production.
Also side note, I think you guys probably just migrated to new domains but there seems to be a couple 404 links/pages on the site? The ones I was looking in particular are these two http://insightdataengineering.com/insightdataengineering.com... http://insightdataengineering.com/insightdataengineering.com...
Also, there's an cert error that pops up in Firefox for http://insightdata.ai
Thanks for the heads up. Fixing now.
I'm a physics PhD (working in ultrafast atomic molecular and optical physics theory), finishing up in the next few months, and I would love to transition into AI as a field. Unfortunately, I don't have an extensive portfolio of ML projects. Is this something I should beef up before I apply?
I understand you are likely much more comfortable with taking people interested in SV and NY, but for those in other areas (Denver, for example) and unwilling to relocate, is this going to kill our chances of being accepted?
As an aside: it’s astounding how quickly Fellows with strong quantitative backgrounds can learn when surrounded by other really great people. We’ve had numerous mathematicians and theoretical physicists at Insight who barely touched any data in their PhDs, go on to build sophisticated machine learning data products at Insight and get hired at top tier data science and machine learning teams.
Regarding the location: the initial programs will focus on roles in the SF Bay Area and New York, so we’d like to attract Fellows who are interested in living in either of those respective cities. That said, our network has grown well beyond those cities so I encourage you to apply regardless of geographic preference and just let us know in the application where you hope to end up after the program.
The program looks really interesting and I'd definitely like to increase my skills in this area, but it's also unlikely that I would accept a job at a new company. (I would be happy to interview though - maybe a company could convince me.)
Also, I would suggest putting the important information in something besides a "white paper," like a FAQ.
I've come back to both mentor and hang out with their fellows every single batch since (I think I've been to 15 now), and it continues to amaze me just how incredible the people are, and how cool the community is.
If you're thinking of a career in AI and you have some of the fundamentals they're looking for at https://www.insightdata.ai, you'd be crazy not to apply.
Can you say which companies you have lined up to hire people in NYC?
P.S. If anyone is looking to hire a research engineer before August of next year, my email is in my profile... :)
I'm curious about the extent they already take 'winners' and usher them into jobs they could have landed without the programme (and the converse).
A recent example was a Data Science Fellow who was a physics postdoc at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab prior to Insight. Right after his postdoc ended, he applied to half a dozen bay area tech companies (all the usual brand name suspects), got rejected from all of them. He came to Insight and during his fellowship built a video scene segmentation & object detection project with a YC startup. After Insight he got an offer from every one of the companies he previously got rejected from. He went on to accept an offer on the LinkedIn data science security team (which is led by another Insight alum).
We’ve seen this happen time and again on the software engineering side as well with our data engineering program. A Data Engineering Fellow prior to Insight has a generalist software engineer experience but a passion for big data, wants to do big data full-time, but no one will take a chance on her/him. At Insight they build a sophisticated data pipeline on AWS, while being mentored by leading data engineers, and then the same companies previously rejecting that Fellow for data engineering roles make offers because they now have the evidence they need that she/he can solve the types of specialized problems the company is facing.
However, it can be pretty hard to even get an interview if you don't fit what recruiters pattern matching against, so in some sense this is helping companies make smarter recruiting decisions.