The releases expose corruption, it isn't necessarily partisan. Wikileaks used to release documents about George W Bush, and Putin as well.
The releases expose corruption, it isn't necessarily partisan. Wikileaks used to release documents about George W Bush, and Putin as well.
That's not what the FBI investigation is saying:
> Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said Friday that they are confident that senior-level Russian officials were involved in the hacks.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/john-podesta-wikileaks...
Are you implying that the DNC intentionally leaked the emails to wikileaks and are colluding with the FBI to blame Russia?
Nope. He's just implying that FBI and DNC are working together.
What is more likely though is: DNC was hacked, Wikileaks is doing what it has done for 10 years i.e. releasing information so that it makes maximum impact and Clintons are trying to damage-control by implying that Russia is involved... all while telling their Russian friends to pretend as if they support Trump (who has never worked with anything Russian ever... unlike the Clintons).
> Trump (who has never worked with anything Russian ever... unlike the Clintons)
I can't tell if this is satire. Trump's campaign manager was responsible for installing 2 Pro-Putin dictators [1]. Also considering that Assange works for RT [2] (Russia's international Propos machine [3] which is all pro-Trump ATM), I think it's more likely that the FBI isn't fabricating facts here when they say the hack was related to Russia.
[1] http://www.politifact.com/global-news/article/2016/may/02/pa...
[2] https://www.rt.com/tags/the-julian-assange-show/
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Propaganda_and...