Where Have All the Hackers Gone?
strydehax.blogspot.com
strydehax.blogspot.com
Instead, the availability of these types of devices (iPhone, Smartphones) has increased the level of technical knowledge in every day society. For example, there are more people that know how to jailbreak an iPhone than there are hackers. For some non-technical people, this very technical process has become something commonplace.
The reports from DARPA and the US Air Force are suspect in their relevance to this discussion. There are several factors that could weigh upon their low projections: military recruitment rate is down in the US and there is general displeasure with the government.
Also, computer science has become ubiquitous in several fields. For example, all of the majors at my engineering university are required to take some form of computer science. Creating tools and solving problems with software has become an everyday part of any engineers' tool belt. Perhaps the hackers are migrating to domain specific areas?
And, finally, that doesn't mean we should be complacent. It is still (and always will be) our charge to engage younger generations in the fulfillment and excitement that comes from solving tough problems.
Sometimes the law is an ass, and needs to be broken.
And sometimes you're just so damn curious you have to figure out how it works, and you break it for the rush of both solving the problem and sticking it to the man.
Most people outgrow the latter, but I would think twice about the credentials of any programmer that did not do things of questionable legality growing up.
Curiosity is to be encouraged.
I am, of course, one anecdote. But I think that your test is a poor one.
Tinkering people don't represent the majority of device users. If they want to learn and tinker, there are ways (e.g. Linux).
And most importantly, your attempts to delve into the
mysteries of how the device functions will be punished.
Grab the SDK and delve into the mysteries.edit: from the wiki article on SS7 ...
SS5 and earlier systems used in-band signaling, in which the call-setup information was sent by playing special multi-frequency tones into the telephone lines, known as bearer channels in the parlance of the telecom industry. This led to security problems with blue boxes. Modern designs of telephone equipment that implement out-of-band signaling protocols explicitly keep the end-user's audio path—the so-called speech path—separate from the signaling phase to eliminate the possibility that end users may introduce tones that would be mistaken for those used for signaling.
Man, you are doing it wrong.
What laws is he referring to? DCMA?
I think he meant to write: "the inherent advantage that this generation of tinkerers gave America"