You can definitely have secret warrants. How could you not? Imagine if the cops had to publish the details of wiretaps. What use would they be? Nevertheless, the secrecy must be justified and approved by a judge every few months.
You can definitely have secret warrants. How could you not? Imagine if the cops had to publish the details of wiretaps. What use would they be? Nevertheless, the secrecy must be justified and approved by a judge every few months.
Edit: It's amazing that I'm being downvoted for a factual response to "Troops on the ground in sovereign nations without a declaration of war?"
As it stands we have far more military engagements on foreign soil than we've seen since and maybe including WW2. We have a corrupt political system and state that is in ever excessive violation of our own constitution, and a people oppressed and divided.
We really need another JFK or Reagan in terms of charisma and general popular support, if not in somewhat similar political views. Another Truman or Eisenhower would probably be better, but could never get into office today.
Most of NSA's warrantless surveillance was probably technically legal, or at least did not constitute mens rea, but that doesn't make it any better.
No, you are being downvoted because apparently you have been living in a hole for the past 15 years.
Secret prisons - CIA black sites, Chicago detainment center
Secret warrants - FISA warrants are almost never rejected, and I'm not sure they need to be reapproved in general. They are almost never declassified, even after the wiretap is completed.
How did those criminals get to be that way, hmm?
It's not like they make all of that money off of ... kidnapping. Or robbery.
It's drugs. They make the money from selling substances that are illegal briefcase of our insane, failed drug policy. These criminals would not be so wealthy if drugs were legal. That's a simple, straight up, undeniable fact.