> I've been singing the praise of AWS Route53 for a long time, they up and running.
I'm a fan of Route53, too.
But can we say that it weathered the attack? Or was it just lucky that its systems weren't targeted?
I'm a fan of Route53, too.
But can we say that it weathered the attack? Or was it just lucky that its systems weren't targeted?
I've seen them be hit by dDos attacks in the past, but never had any significant impact.
(I wrap Route53 and handle storing DNS records in a git repository over at https://dns-api.com/ Adding support for other backends is my current priority to allow more redundancy.)
I was wondering that too