Electronic surveillance up 5x in DC area since 2011, almost all sealed cases
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
When only 1 of 4,100 cases over five years in a particular district has the public record unsealed, I think it's safe to call this a cover-up.
> Yet the listings of how often law enforcement applied to judges to conduct covert electronic surveillance — a list that itself is usually sealed... The information about what are known as pen register and trap and trace orders was made public after litigation by the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), journalists and others, including some service providers.
You know, when the press operates as it should, as nonpartisan fact finder and uncovering truth through hard-fought FOIA battles, well first your sick about whatever you just read, then at least you feel a bit better knowing that at least someone is trying to shine some light on it.
Funny; a literal opaque wall asking me to login or view offers came down over the content when I loaded it up (with no apparent way of dismissing it).
> ... warrant appeared to authorize the FBI to secretly place code, or malware, on all computers that logged in to an anonymous email service...
I keep thinking of the parallels between the actions of spearphishing criminals and these law enforcement agencies.