Isn't there a better alternative to an abbreviation that's already widely used in the software engineering context?
If we could get away from policies though, Performant Content Contracts doesn't overlap with much that is CS related.
I think everyone keeps making name collisions to be a much bigger deal than they are in reality.
EDIT: Mostly I’m just annoyed that those useless off-topics about naming keep crowding out actual discussion.
It's going to take significant momentum to displace "CPP" in the appropriate computing contexts.
Anyway if discoverability is an issue they can always give it a catchy marketing name (Project Swift Gazelle) later. CPP is the appropriate name for the proposal, given the relevant context.