“She is a treacherous, lying, murderous woman that could care less of our rights and our constitution."
It's no pulitzer-prize winner but it's also not "[Your candidate] = Hitler."
I cannot say that the media is getting more biased - it might have always been biased, and I just failed to notice - but I think it's getting more obviously biased, to the extent that "normal" people (i.e. the majority of the population) are loosing any trust they had in media. This doesn't bode well for the media and for our collective future...
> > “She is a treacherous, lying, murderous woman that could care less of our rights and our constitution."
> Basically, that statement about Hillary is 100% correct.
I'd be genuinely interested to see any evidence that points to treachery, murder, or her not caring about rights or the constitution.
I'm not looking for 100% evidence here, just any evidence that strongly points in that direction. (With citations to other sources, obviously. Just saying she has killed people doesn't count).
Treachery - AFAIK, other people have been charged with treason for toying with Top Secret information like she has (sending it to/from insecure email addresses).
Not caring about rights - she voted to build the Mexican wall (something Trump is often criticised for even suggesting), and said that US should "drone" Assange. (Technically, assuming the original commenter is a US citizen, that's not technically "our" rights, but given her statement about Assange, I'd imagine she'd also support "droning" of US citizens, as US has done in the past few years.)
Not caring about the constitution - I don't really disagree with her here (I don't agree with her either - basically, it's complicated), but I guess you could frame her support for greater gun control as "not respecting the constitution".