Hacker News Reader

I found the article interesting in the forensic details (in spite of the political details), in the same way I found Mark Bowden's "Worm" interesting. I can see how some might not.

> we need to be posting regularly about how HC is breaking the law

This article details an interesting technical investigation by leading security experts and also it bears more analysis, resulting in some interesting discussion. Clinton's email servers were also discussed. When Trump or Clinton do something non-technical, it's not discussed.

> and how Google, Facebook, and Twitter are suppressing free speech

That topic is frequently discussed.

Mostly because I wanted to hear what some real experts thought of the evidence presented.