That is an excellent point.
But, reading back over the posts I see that I introduced the concept of warfare even though the original points I questioned did not. So, back to my first questions; who benefits from manipulating medical and aircraft equipment on a large enough scale to be compared to potential financial fraud?
Wait, targeted assassination that starts a war... That's been done before, but unlikely.
>> If we can't trust them for voting, we really have to reconsider their usefulness.
It's not that I don't trust the computers, it's that I don't trust people.