The same NYT whose profit shrank by 95,7% in the last quarter because of the extremely biased reporting?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3897406/New-York-Tim...

And the exactly same numbers by Reuters but with completely misleading headline as if everything was fine:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-newyorktimes-results-idUSK...

Funny how the NYT now makes about as much profit as I do as a contractor. Maybe I should buy them and put their journalists to more profitable use, like for example letting them clean toilets or work the streets.

Edit: Why the downvotes? Does somebody dispute the fact that the NYT's profits are down by 95,7%? Or would somebody dispute that this company wouldn't be making more profit if it sent its employees to clean toilets or sell their bodies?

I believe I made here a sensible business case for saving the NYT.