How is a sandwich review in any way 'imperialistic'?
Guy has opinions about a sandwich, guy exercises his fourth amendment right to share that opinion. Other people disagree, which is also fine. End of story. How is this even news?
Guy has opinions about a sandwich, guy exercises his fourth amendment right to share that opinion. Other people disagree, which is also fine. End of story. How is this even news?
Wrong amendment.
But I do find thinking about the implications of the Fourth Amendment for sandwich reviews to be infinitely more amusing than the article at hand, so thanks for that.
Holding it with one hand: illegal seizure.
Reviews based on the above: subject to the exclusionary rule. All mentions of the contents must be stricken from the record.
"And it did not help that the reporter called the bread a “sub roll,” not a hero, as it is commonly called in New York, revealing herself to be an outsider"
I mean, if you have to reduce criticism down to cant or a regionalism to support your point of view, then I think that point of view is very weak.
I mean, the irony is these same people are the ones who will say, you have to see things from a global perspective (fine by me), we're not an island but then go right back into ultra-islander mode.