As a quant, I can't say I've heard of a single quant I know who uses Julia. It very well could be promising, but firms will be very hesitant to switch from Matlab, R, Python, C++, and VBA
"We've been spending a lot of time working with firms to replace K code."
Maybe the small percentage that uses K/Q/KDB+ are moving to something more readable?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRWZBWwBVR0 (I can't listen to the audio now so I'm not sure how much I misparaphrased.) And, you're right, I shouldn't have conflated KDB+ with K.
> if you learn the language, you'll find it perfectly readable, elegant even.
Just comparing K to something like Python.. Though, personally, it only became (somewhat) readable after playing with APL and J for a year.
When competing for talent and desperate for maintainability, companies are unlikely to introduce tools that are not the industry standard.